Labels: hack, memory, problem, screen, screensave, startwars, x11
Why does kamix take more memory than Emacs? I mean, for that matter, why does Emacs take more memory than Firefox? Still, wtF? Fully graphical web browser - Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.2 is listed in top as taking 0.5% of memory (we're talking 512M here, I believe) - and that's running maximized and with the Performancing blogging extension open.
GNU Emacs, on the other hand - a text editor with a text inerface, but running under X (so I guess there are a few widgets allocated there) - Emacs is taking up (again: according to top) 3.7% of RAM, with no files open, and no child processes running (?).
Now, this is nothing, really (3.7%) as we look up the list from bottom to top - in the same vicinity as Emacs on this listing (sorted by %MEM) we have such notable applications and services as kalarmd (3.8%), gkrellm (3.3%), and (less than 3%) xterm, artsd, etc. No, this is nothing - we're in the lightweight end of the listing - let's look closer to the top.
Let's see ... kdeinit (4.1%), kdeinit (4.2%), kdeinit (4.5%) ... the list goes on - altogether there are something like 16 instances of kdeinit running, each of them taking up more RAM individually than either Emacs or Firefox - more, in fact than any other of the 15-odd applications running except for e.g. X (7.9%), kgpg (6.3%), kamix (5.4%) ... whoops - wait, I've overlooked something: firefox-bin is running up at the top, consuming some 12.7% - followed by the #1 instance of kdeinit (10.5%) second, and X itself (7.9%) third....
So please ignore what I said about Firefox at the beginning - that was 'firefox' the script that starts 'firefox-bin' - everything else was [i think] pretty accurate.
2004/09 2005/03 2005/04 2005/05 2005/06 2005/07 2005/08 2005/09 2005/10 2005/11 2006/01 2006/02 2006/04 2006/05 2006/06 2008/01
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]